"리만 곡면의 주기 행렬과 겹선형 관계 (bilinear relation)"의 두 판 사이의 차이

2012년 7월 26일 (목) 02:54 판

\(\omega_i\in \Omega^{1,0}\)

\((\omega_k,\omega_l)=i\int_{X} \omega_k \wedge \omega_l=0\)

\(\omega\neq 0\)

\((\omega,\bar{\omega})=i\int_{X} \omega \wedge \bar{\omega}>0\)

@@ 2번째 줄: / 2번째 줄: @@
 [http://mathoverflow.net/questions/22286/intuition-behind-riemanns-bilinear-relations ]http://mathoverflow.net/questions/22286/intuition-behind-riemanns-bilinear-relations
+[http://www-nonlinear.physik.uni-bremen.de/%7Eprichter/pdfs/ThetaConst.pdf http://www-nonlinear.physik.uni-bremen.de/~prichter/pdfs/ThetaConst.pdf]
+http://magma.maths.usyd.edu.au/magma/handbook/text/1402
+[http://www.math.harvard.edu/%7Ectm/home/text/class/harvard/sem/html/home/notes/99/course.pdf http://www.math.harvard.edu/~ctm/home/text/class/harvard/sem/html/home/notes/99/course.pdf]
-<math>(\omega,\eta)=i\int_{X} \omega \wedge \bar{\eta}</math>
+http://people.reed.edu/~jerry/311/theta.pdf
+<math>\omega_i\in \Omega^{1,0}</math>
+<math>(\omega_k,\omega_l)=i\int_{X} \omega_k \wedge \omega_l=0</math>
+<math>\omega\neq 0</math>
+<math>(\omega,\bar{\omega})=i\int_{X} \omega \wedge \bar{\omega}>0</math>