"Dual reductive pair"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
imported>Pythagoras0
(새 문서: ==introduciton== * In the mid-1970s, Howe [8] introduced the notion of dual pairs in $Mp(W)$: these are subgroups of $Mp(W)$ of the form $G \times H$ where $G$ and $H$ are mutual cent...)
 
imported>Pythagoras0
2번째 줄: 2번째 줄:
 
* In the mid-1970s, Howe [8] introduced the notion of dual pairs in $Mp(W)$: these are subgroups of $Mp(W)$ of the form $G \times H$ where $G$ and $H$ are mutual centralisers of each other.  
 
* In the mid-1970s, Howe [8] introduced the notion of dual pairs in $Mp(W)$: these are subgroups of $Mp(W)$ of the form $G \times H$ where $G$ and $H$ are mutual centralisers of each other.  
 
* He gave a classification and construction of all such possible dual pairs. They basically take the following form:
 
* He gave a classification and construction of all such possible dual pairs. They basically take the following form:
* (i) if $U$ is a quadratic space with corresponding orthogonal group $O(U)$ and $V$ a symplectic space with corresponding metaplectic group $Mp(V)$, then $W = U \times V$ is naturally a symplectic space, and $O(U)\times Mp(V)$ is a dual pair in $Mp(W) = Mp(U \otimes V)$.  
+
* (i) if $U$ is a quadratic space with corresponding orthogonal group $O(U)$ and $V$ a symplectic space with corresponding metaplectic group $Mp(V)$, then $W = U \otimes V$ is naturally a symplectic space, and $O(U)\times Mp(V)$ is a dual pair in $Mp(W) = Mp(U \otimes V)$.  
 
* (ii) $U(V)\times  U(V')$, where $V$ and $V'$ are Hermitian and skew-Hermitian spaces respectively for a quadratic extension $E/F$.
 
* (ii) $U(V)\times  U(V')$, where $V$ and $V'$ are Hermitian and skew-Hermitian spaces respectively for a quadratic extension $E/F$.
 
* (iii) $GL(U) \times GL(V)$, where $U$ and $V$ are vector spaces over $F$.
 
* (iii) $GL(U) \times GL(V)$, where $U$ and $V$ are vector spaces over $F$.
* The dual pairs in (i) and (ii) are called Type I dual pairs, while those in (iii) are called Type II.  
+
* The dual pairs in (i) and (ii) are called Type I dual pairs, while those in (iii) are called Type II.
 
 
  
 
==Type II dual pairs==
 
==Type II dual pairs==
 
* It is particularly easy to describe the Weil representation $\Omega$ for Type II dual pairs.  
 
* It is particularly easy to describe the Weil representation $\Omega$ for Type II dual pairs.  
 
* The group $GL(U) \times GL(V)$ acts naturally on $U \otimes V$ and hence on the space $S(U \otimes V)$ of Schwarz functions: this is the Weil representation $\Omega$.
 
* The group $GL(U) \times GL(V)$ acts naturally on $U \otimes V$ and hence on the space $S(U \otimes V)$ of Schwarz functions: this is the Weil representation $\Omega$.

2017년 1월 16일 (월) 23:14 판

introduciton

  • In the mid-1970s, Howe [8] introduced the notion of dual pairs in $Mp(W)$: these are subgroups of $Mp(W)$ of the form $G \times H$ where $G$ and $H$ are mutual centralisers of each other.
  • He gave a classification and construction of all such possible dual pairs. They basically take the following form:
  • (i) if $U$ is a quadratic space with corresponding orthogonal group $O(U)$ and $V$ a symplectic space with corresponding metaplectic group $Mp(V)$, then $W = U \otimes V$ is naturally a symplectic space, and $O(U)\times Mp(V)$ is a dual pair in $Mp(W) = Mp(U \otimes V)$.
  • (ii) $U(V)\times U(V')$, where $V$ and $V'$ are Hermitian and skew-Hermitian spaces respectively for a quadratic extension $E/F$.
  • (iii) $GL(U) \times GL(V)$, where $U$ and $V$ are vector spaces over $F$.
  • The dual pairs in (i) and (ii) are called Type I dual pairs, while those in (iii) are called Type II.

Type II dual pairs

  • It is particularly easy to describe the Weil representation $\Omega$ for Type II dual pairs.
  • The group $GL(U) \times GL(V)$ acts naturally on $U \otimes V$ and hence on the space $S(U \otimes V)$ of Schwarz functions: this is the Weil representation $\Omega$.