"Periods and transcendental number theory"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
2번째 줄: 2번째 줄:
  
 
 
 
 
 +
 +
http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/05/ambiguity_theory.html
 +
 +
 
 +
 +
This [http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.2568 paper] – Ambiguity theory, old and new – is rather fun and would be good to understand thoroughly if we hope to get 2-Galois to do anything important. It’s by Yves André of the ENS, and refers to a comment made by Galois that he was working with a <em style="line-height: 2em;">théorie de l’ambiguïté</em>. Good to see Albert [http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/04/returning_to_lautman.html Lautman] receiving a mention.
 +
 +
For those who want something less introductory, on the same day André has deposited [http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.2569 Galois theory, motives and transcendental numbers]. Lots there about Kontsevich and Zagier’s[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Period_(number) Periods], described in their article of that name in <em style="line-height: 2em;">Mathematics Unlimited – 2001 and beyond</em>, pages 771-808, unfortunately now no longer available on the Web.
  
 
 
 
 
26번째 줄: 34번째 줄:
 
<h5 style="line-height: 3.428em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; color: rgb(34, 61, 103); font-family: 'malgun gothic', dotum, gulim, sans-serif; font-size: 1.166em; background-image: ; background-color: initial; background-position: 0px 100%;">encyclopedia</h5>
 
<h5 style="line-height: 3.428em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; color: rgb(34, 61, 103); font-family: 'malgun gothic', dotum, gulim, sans-serif; font-size: 1.166em; background-image: ; background-color: initial; background-position: 0px 100%;">encyclopedia</h5>
  
 +
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Period_(number)
 
* http://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/
 
* http://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/
 
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
 
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
45번째 줄: 54번째 줄:
 
*  Zagier-Kontsevich<br>
 
*  Zagier-Kontsevich<br>
 
** [[4066213/attachments/2023761|periods.ps]]<br>
 
** [[4066213/attachments/2023761|periods.ps]]<br>
−
*  <br>
+
* [http://people.math.jussieu.fr/~miw/articles/pdf/TranscendencePeriods.pdf Transcendence of periods: the state of the art.]<br>
−
**  M. Waldschmidt. Transcendence of periods: the state of the art. Pure Appl. Math. Q. 2 (2006), 435-463.<br>
+
**  M. Waldschmidt., Pure Appl. Math. Q. 2 (2006), 435-463.<br>
 
* [[2010년 books and articles|논문정리]]
 
* [[2010년 books and articles|논문정리]]
 
* http://www.zentralblatt-math.org/zmath/en/
 
* http://www.zentralblatt-math.org/zmath/en/
59번째 줄: 68번째 줄:
 
<h5 style="line-height: 3.428em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; color: rgb(34, 61, 103); font-family: 'malgun gothic', dotum, gulim, sans-serif; font-size: 1.166em; background-image: ; background-color: initial; background-position: 0px 100%;">TeX </h5>
 
<h5 style="line-height: 3.428em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; color: rgb(34, 61, 103); font-family: 'malgun gothic', dotum, gulim, sans-serif; font-size: 1.166em; background-image: ; background-color: initial; background-position: 0px 100%;">TeX </h5>
  
−
 
+
<br>
−
 
 
−
http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/05/ambiguity_theory.html
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
 
 
−
This [http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.2568 paper] – Ambiguity theory, old and new – is rather fun and would be good to understand thoroughly if we hope to get 2-Galois to do anything important. It’s by Yves André of the ENS, and refers to a comment made by Galois that he was working with a <em style="">théorie de l’ambiguïté</em>. Good to see Albert [http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/04/returning_to_lautman.html Lautman] receiving a mention.
 
−
 
 
−
For those who want something less introductory, on the same day André has deposited [http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.2569 Galois theory, motives and transcendental numbers]. Lots there about Kontsevich and Zagier’s[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Period_(number) Periods], described in their article of that name in <em style="">Mathematics Unlimited – 2001 and beyond</em>, pages 771-808, unfortunately now no longer available on the Web.
 
  
−
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Period_(number)
+
<br>
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
<br>
 
<br>

2009년 9월 1일 (화) 11:58 판

introduction

 

http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/05/ambiguity_theory.html

 

This paper – Ambiguity theory, old and new – is rather fun and would be good to understand thoroughly if we hope to get 2-Galois to do anything important. It’s by Yves André of the ENS, and refers to a comment made by Galois that he was working with a théorie de l’ambiguïté. Good to see Albert Lautman receiving a mention.

For those who want something less introductory, on the same day André has deposited Galois theory, motives and transcendental numbers. Lots there about Kontsevich and Zagier’sPeriods, described in their article of that name in Mathematics Unlimited – 2001 and beyond, pages 771-808, unfortunately now no longer available on the Web.

 

related items

 

 

books

 

 

encyclopedia

 

blogs

 

articles

 

TeX 



 


원본 주소 "https://wiki.mathnt.net/index.php?title=Periods_and_transcendental_number_theory&oldid=39811"