"Periods and transcendental number theory"의 두 판 사이의 차이

@@ 1번째 줄: / 1번째 줄: @@
-==introduction==
-* http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/05/ambiguity_theory.html<br>
-This [http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.2568 paper] – Ambiguity theory, old and new – is rather fun and would be good to understand thoroughly if we hope to get 2-Galois to do anything important. It’s by Yves André of the ENS, and refers to a comment made by Galois that he was working with a <em style="line-height: 2em;">théorie de l’ambiguïté</em>. Good to see Albert [http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2008/04/returning_to_lautman.html Lautman] receiving a mention.
-For those who want something less introductory, on the same day André has deposited [http://arxiv.org/abs/0805.2569 Galois theory, motives and transcendental numbers].
-Lots there about Kontsevich and Zagier’s[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Period_%28number%29 Periods], described in their article of that name in <em style="line-height: 2em;">Mathematics Unlimited – 2001 and beyond</em>, pages 771-808, unfortunately now no longer available on the Web.
-==related items==
-* [[K-theory]]<br>
-==encyclopedia==
-* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Period_%28number%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Period_(number)]
-[[분류:개인노트]]
-[[분류:math and physics]]
-[[분류:math and physics]]
-[[분류:math]]
-[[분류:K-theory]]

2020년 11월 13일 (금) 07:11 판