"Abstract nonsense"의 두 판 사이의 차이
둘러보기로 가기
검색하러 가기
Pythagoras0 (토론 | 기여) (→노트: 새 문단) |
Pythagoras0 (토론 | 기여) (→메타데이터: 새 문단) |
||
| 14번째 줄: | 14번째 줄: | ||
===소스=== | ===소스=== | ||
<references /> | <references /> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == 메타데이터 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===위키데이터=== | ||
| + | * ID : [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1084766 Q1084766] | ||
2020년 12월 26일 (토) 05:45 판
노트
- Such proofs are sometimes dubbed “abstract nonsense” as a light-hearted way of alerting people to their abstract nature.[1]
- Likewise for f. Author of this article was very impressed by the math abstract nonsense and even developed a Category theory software.[2]
- Then author introduced an “abstract nonsense” paradigm in other his software.[2]
- Author find that abstract nonsense is very effective.[2]
- Author thinks that abstract nonsense would not be accepted at once since lot of engineers are familiar with above data flow diagrams.[2]
- This abstraction power of category theory has led Norman Steenrod to coin the term abstract nonsense or general abstract nonsense for it.[3]
- It is being used as in “This property is not specific to this context, it already follows from general abstract nonsense”.[3]
- But abstract nonsense still tends to meet with some resistance.[3]
- As a professional mathematician, I hope you don't mind a few comments from me on "abstract nonsense".[4]
- In fact, the Wikipedia entry goes on to describe more-or-less precisely what kind of argument "by abstract nonsense" refers to.[4]
- Authors sometimes dub these proofs “abstract nonsense” as a light-hearted way of alerting readers to their abstract nature.[5]
소스
메타데이터
위키데이터
- ID : Q1084766