"Discrete subgroups of Lie groups"의 두 판 사이의 차이
둘러보기로 가기
검색하러 가기
(피타고라스님이 이 페이지를 개설하였습니다.) |
imported>Pythagoras0 |
||
(사용자 2명의 중간 판 4개는 보이지 않습니다) | |||
1번째 줄: | 1번째 줄: | ||
+ | ==introduction== | ||
+ | * More than three decades ago, in a remarkable paper [MS81], Margulis and Soifer proved existence of maximal subgroups of infinite index in SL(n,Z), answering a question of Platonov. Moreover, they proved that there are uncountably many such subgroups. Since then, it is expected that there should be examples of various different nature. However, as the proof is non-constructive and relies on the axiom of choice, it is highly non-trivial to put the hand on specific properties of the resulting groups. Our purpose here is to show that indeed, maximal subgroups of different nature do exist. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==articles== | ||
+ | * Gelander, Tsachik, and Chen Meiri. “Maximal Subgroups of SL(n, Z).” arXiv:1511.05767 [math], November 18, 2015. http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.05767. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[분류:math and physics]] | ||
+ | [[분류:Lie theory]] | ||
+ | [[분류:migrate]] |
2020년 11월 13일 (금) 02:09 기준 최신판
introduction
- More than three decades ago, in a remarkable paper [MS81], Margulis and Soifer proved existence of maximal subgroups of infinite index in SL(n,Z), answering a question of Platonov. Moreover, they proved that there are uncountably many such subgroups. Since then, it is expected that there should be examples of various different nature. However, as the proof is non-constructive and relies on the axiom of choice, it is highly non-trivial to put the hand on specific properties of the resulting groups. Our purpose here is to show that indeed, maximal subgroups of different nature do exist.
articles
- Gelander, Tsachik, and Chen Meiri. “Maximal Subgroups of SL(n, Z).” arXiv:1511.05767 [math], November 18, 2015. http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.05767.