"Symmetry and conserved quantitiy : Noether's theorem"의 두 판 사이의 차이
imported>Pythagoras0 |
imported>Pythagoras0 |
||
| 25번째 줄: | 25번째 줄: | ||
* to each generator $T_a$, associate the current density | * to each generator $T_a$, associate the current density | ||
:<math>j_{a}^{\mu}(x)= \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial ( \partial_\mu \phi )}iT_a \phi</math> | :<math>j_{a}^{\mu}(x)= \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial ( \partial_\mu \phi )}iT_a \phi</math> | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ==Local Versus Global Conservation== | ||
| + | Equation (10.165) embodies the idea of local conservation, which is stronger than global conservation. Globally, something like energy could well be con-served in that it might disappear in one place only to reappear in another a long way away. But this seems never to be observed in Nature; if energy does disappear in one place and reappear in another, we always observe a current of energy in between those places. That is, energy is conserved locally, which is a much stronger idea than mere global conservation. Even so, it might well be that something can appear from nowhere in an apparent example of nonconser-vation. “Flatlanders” —beings who are confined to a 2-surface—might observe the arrival of a 2-sphere (i.e. a common garden-variety sphere that needs to be embedded in three dimensions) that passes through their world. What will they see? First, a dot appears, which rapidly grows into a circle before growing smaller again to eventually vanish. The Flatlanders have witnessed a higher-dimensional object passing through their world; they might well be perplexed, since the circle seemed to come out of the void before vanishing back into it. | ||
2013년 7월 6일 (토) 04:15 판
introduction
- fields
- the condition for the extreme of a functional leads to Euler-Lagrange equation
- invariance of functional imposes another constraint
- Noether's theorem : extreme+invariance -> conservation law
- 틀:수학노트
field theoretic formulation
- \(\alpha_{s}\) continuous symmetry with parameter s, i.e. the action does not change by the action of $\alpha_{s}$
- define the current density \(j(x)=(j^0(x),j^1(x),j^2(x),j^3(x))\) by
\[j^{\mu}(x)= \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial ( \partial_\mu \phi )}\left(\frac{\partial\alpha_{s}(\phi)}{\partial s} \right) \]
- then it obeys the continuity equation
\[\partial_{\mu} j^{\mu}=\sum_{\mu=0}^{3}\frac{\partial j^{\mu}}{\partial x^{\mu}}=0\]
- \(j^{0}(x)\) density of some abstract fluid
- Put $\rho:=j_0$ and \(\mathbf{J}=(j_x,j_y,j_z)\) velocity of this abstract fluid at each space time point
- conserved charge
\[Q(t)=\int_V \rho \,d^3 x\] \[\frac{dQ}{dt}=0\]
gauge theory
- to each generator $T_a$, associate the current density
\[j_{a}^{\mu}(x)= \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial ( \partial_\mu \phi )}iT_a \phi\]
Local Versus Global Conservation
Equation (10.165) embodies the idea of local conservation, which is stronger than global conservation. Globally, something like energy could well be con-served in that it might disappear in one place only to reappear in another a long way away. But this seems never to be observed in Nature; if energy does disappear in one place and reappear in another, we always observe a current of energy in between those places. That is, energy is conserved locally, which is a much stronger idea than mere global conservation. Even so, it might well be that something can appear from nowhere in an apparent example of nonconser-vation. “Flatlanders” —beings who are confined to a 2-surface—might observe the arrival of a 2-sphere (i.e. a common garden-variety sphere that needs to be embedded in three dimensions) that passes through their world. What will they see? First, a dot appears, which rapidly grows into a circle before growing smaller again to eventually vanish. The Flatlanders have witnessed a higher-dimensional object passing through their world; they might well be perplexed, since the circle seemed to come out of the void before vanishing back into it.
history
encyclopedia