"K-theory"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
7번째 줄: 7번째 줄:
 
 
 
 
  
<h5 style="line-height: 2em; margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; color: rgb(34, 61, 103); font-family: 'malgun gothic', dotum, gulim, sans-serif; font-size: 1.166em; background-image: ; background-color: initial; background-position: 0px 100%;">Borel</h5>
+
<h5 style="line-height: 2em; margin: 0px; color: rgb(34, 61, 103); font-family: 'malgun gothic',dotum,gulim,sans-serif; font-size: 1.166em; background-position: 0px 100%;">Borel</h5>
  
 
*  [F:Q]=r_1+2r_2<br>
 
*  [F:Q]=r_1+2r_2<br>
49번째 줄: 49번째 줄:
 
 
 
 
  
<h5>articles[[2010년 books and articles|]]</h5>
+
<h5>articles</h5>
  
 
* [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2318406 an introduction to algebraic K-theory]<br>
 
* [http://www.jstor.org/stable/2318406 an introduction to algebraic K-theory]<br>
58번째 줄: 58번째 줄:
 
** Charles A. Weibel
 
** Charles A. Weibel
 
* [http://math.berkeley.edu/%7Ehutching/teach/215b-2004/courtney.pdf A brief glance at K-theory]
 
* [http://math.berkeley.edu/%7Ehutching/teach/215b-2004/courtney.pdf A brief glance at K-theory]
* http://www.spencerstirling.com/papers/ktheory.pdf
+
* [http://www.spencerstirling.com/papers/ktheory.pdf ]http://www.spencerstirling.com/papers/ktheory.pdf
  
* http://www.ams.org/mathscinet/search/publications.html?pg4=ALLF&s4=
+
 
* http://www.zentralblatt-math.org/zmath/en/
 
* http://pythagoras0.springnote.com/
 
* [http://math.berkeley.edu/%7Ereb/papers/index.html http://math.berkeley.edu/~reb/papers/index.html]
 
  
* http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/search?a=&t=&c=&n=40&s=Listings&q=
+
 
* http://www.ams.org/mathscinet/search/publications.html?pg4=AUCN&s4=&co4=AND&pg5=TI&s5=&co5=AND&pg6=PC&s6=&co6=AND&pg7=ALLF&co7=AND&Submit=Search&dr=all&yrop=eq&arg3=&yearRangeFirst=&yearRangeSecond=&pg8=ET&s8=All&s7=
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
<h5>TeX </h5>
+
<h5>questions</h5>
 +
 
 +
* http://mathoverflow.net/questions/364/motivation-for-algebraic-k-theory

2011년 6월 21일 (화) 05:37 판