"Knot theory"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
1번째 줄: 1번째 줄:
 
<h5>introduction</h5>
 
<h5>introduction</h5>
 +
 +
 
 +
 +
* three Reidemeister moves
  
 
 
 
 
16번째 줄: 20번째 줄:
  
 
* Jones polynomial and Vassiliev invariants
 
* Jones polynomial and Vassiliev invariants
 +
* The puzzle on the mathematical side was that these objects are invariants of a three dimensional situation, but one did not have an intrinsically three dimensional definition.
 +
* There were many elegant definitions of the knot polynomials, but they all involved looking in some way at a two dimensional projection or slicing of the knot, giving a two dimensional algorithm for computation, and proving that the result is independent of the chosen projection. This is analogous to studying a physical<br> theory that is in fact relativistic but in which one does not know of a manifestly<br> relativistic formulation - like quantum electrodynamics in the 1930's.
  
 
 
 
 
27번째 줄: 33번째 줄:
 
** http://www.bkfc.net/altendor/KnotTheoryAndStatisticalMechanics.pdf
 
** http://www.bkfc.net/altendor/KnotTheoryAndStatisticalMechanics.pdf
 
** http://web.phys.ntu.edu.tw/phystalks/Wu.pdf
 
** http://web.phys.ntu.edu.tw/phystalks/Wu.pdf
*  Knot and physics<br>
 
** [http://siba2.unile.it/ese/issues/1/19/Notematv9supplp17.pdf ]http://siba2.unile.it/ese/issues/1/19/Notematv9supplp17.pdf
 
  
 
* using the Boltzmann weights from the various exactly solvable models, we can discover an infinite series of invariants of knots
 
* using the Boltzmann weights from the various exactly solvable models, we can discover an infinite series of invariants of knots
 
* so the problem is to find a nice set of Boltzmann weights which give non-trivial invariants
 
* so the problem is to find a nice set of Boltzmann weights which give non-trivial invariants
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<h5>Knot invariants and quantum groups</h5>
 
  
 
 
 
 
107번째 줄: 105번째 줄:
 
<h5>articles</h5>
 
<h5>articles</h5>
  
 +
* [http://siba2.unile.it/ese/issues/1/19/Notematv9supplp17.pdf Knot and physics]<br>
 +
**  Kauffman, 1989<br>
 
* [http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS?service=UI&version=1.0&verb=Display&handle=euclid.cmp/1104178138 Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial]<br>
 
* [http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS?service=UI&version=1.0&verb=Display&handle=euclid.cmp/1104178138 Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial]<br>
 
** Edward Witten, Comm. Math. Phys. Volume 121, Number 3 (1989), 351-399
 
** Edward Witten, Comm. Math. Phys. Volume 121, Number 3 (1989), 351-399

2010년 1월 28일 (목) 22:15 판

introduction

 

  • three Reidemeister moves

 

 

 

Kauffman's principle

 

 

knot invariants
  • Jones polynomial and Vassiliev invariants
  • The puzzle on the mathematical side was that these objects are invariants of a three dimensional situation, but one did not have an intrinsically three dimensional definition.
  • There were many elegant definitions of the knot polynomials, but they all involved looking in some way at a two dimensional projection or slicing of the knot, giving a two dimensional algorithm for computation, and proving that the result is independent of the chosen projection. This is analogous to studying a physical
    theory that is in fact relativistic but in which one does not know of a manifestly
    relativistic formulation - like quantum electrodynamics in the 1930's.

 

 

Knot theory, statistical mechanics and quantum groups
  • using the Boltzmann weights from the various exactly solvable models, we can discover an infinite series of invariants of knots
  • so the problem is to find a nice set of Boltzmann weights which give non-trivial invariants

 

 

 

history

 

 

related items

 

 

books

 

 

encyclopedia

 

 

question and answers(Math Overflow)

 

 

blogs

 

 

articles

 

 

experts on the field

 

 

TeX