"Appell-Lerch sums"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
139번째 줄: 139번째 줄:
 
<h5>articles</h5>
 
<h5>articles</h5>
  
* [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002200000315 Integrable highest weight modules over affine superalgebras and Appell’s function]<br>
+
* Some characters of Kac and Wakimoto and nonholomorphic modular functions.<br>
** Kac V.G., Wakimoto M, Commun. Math. Phys. '''215'''(3), 631–682 (2001)<br>
+
** K. Bringmann and K. Ono, 
 +
* Math. Annalen 345, pages 547-558 (2009)
 +
*  Higher String Functions, Higher-Level Appell Functions, and the Logarithmic sℓ︿2k/u(1)  CFT Model<br>
 +
** A. M. Semikhatov
 +
*  Higher-Level Appell Functions, Modular Transformations, and Characters<br>
 +
** A.M. Semikhatov
  
 
* [http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/0807.4834 Mock Theta Functions]<br>
 
* [http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/0807.4834 Mock Theta Functions]<br>
 
** Sander [http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/author/S.Zwegers Zwegers], 2002
 
** Sander [http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/author/S.Zwegers Zwegers], 2002
 +
* [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002200000315 Integrable highest weight modules over affine superalgebras and Appell’s function]<br>
 +
** Kac V.G., Wakimoto M, Commun. Math. Phys. '''215'''(3), 631–682 (2001)<br>
  
 
* [[2010년 books and articles|논문정리]]
 
* [[2010년 books and articles|논문정리]]

2010년 4월 7일 (수) 08:33 판

introduction

Appell–Lerch sums were first studied by Paul Émile Appell (1884) and Mathias Lerch (1892). Watson studied the order 3 mock theta functions by expressing them in terms of Appell–Lerch sums, and Zwegers used them to show that mock theta functions are essentially mock modular forms.

 

The Appell–Lerch series is

\(\mu(u,v;\tau) = \frac{a^{1/2}}{\theta(v;\tau)}\sum_{n\in Z}\frac{(-b)^nq^{n(n+1)/2}}{1-aq^n}\)

 

where

\(\displaystyle q= e^{2\pi i \tau},\quad a= e^{2\pi i u},\quad b= e^{2\pi i v}\)

 

and

 

\(\theta(v,\tau) = \sum_{n\in Z}(-1)^n b^{n+1/2}q^{(n+1/2)^2/2}\)

 

The modified series

 

\[\hat\mu(u,v;\tau) = \mu(u,v;\tau)-R(u-v;\tau)/2\]

 

where

 

\[R(z;\tau) = \sum_{\nu\in Z+1/2}(-1)^{\nu-1/2}({\rm sign}(\nu)-E((\nu+\Im(z)/y)\sqrt{2y}))e^{-2\pi i \nu z}q^{-\nu^2/2}\]

 

and y = Im(τ) and

 

\[E(z) = 2\int_0^ze^{-\pi u^2}\,du\]

 

satisfies the following transformation properties

 

\[\hat\mu(u+1,v;\tau) = a^{-1}bq^{-1/2}\hat\mu(u+\tau,v;\tau) = -\hat\mu(u,v;\tau),\]

 

\[e^{2\pi i/8}\hat\mu(u,v;\tau+1) = \hat\mu(u,v;\tau) = -(\tau/i)^{-1/2}e^{\pi i (u-v)^2/\tau}\hat\mu(u/\tau,v/\tau;-1/\tau).\]

 

In other words the modified Appell–Lerch series transforms like a modular form with respect to τ. Since mock theta functions can be expressed in terms of Appell–Lerch series this means that mock theta functions transform like modular forms if they have a certain non-analytic series added to them.

 

 

higher level Appell function

 

 

history

 

 

related items

 

 

books

 

 

 

encyclopedia

 

 

question and answers(Math Overflow)

 

 

blogs

 

 

articles
  • Some characters of Kac and Wakimoto and nonholomorphic modular functions.
    • K. Bringmann and K. Ono, 
  • Math. Annalen 345, pages 547-558 (2009)
  • Higher String Functions, Higher-Level Appell Functions, and the Logarithmic sℓ︿2k/u(1)  CFT Model
    • A. M. Semikhatov
  • Higher-Level Appell Functions, Modular Transformations, and Characters
    • A.M. Semikhatov

 

 

experts on the field

 

 

TeX