"BRST quantization and cohomology"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
51번째 줄: 51번째 줄:
  
 
* [http://www.math.columbia.edu/%7Ewoit/notesonbrst.pdf http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/notesonbrst.pdf]
 
* [http://www.math.columbia.edu/%7Ewoit/notesonbrst.pdf http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/notesonbrst.pdf]
 +
* [http://www.math.columbia.edu/%7Ewoit/wordpress/?cat=12 http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?cat=12]
 
* [http://www.math.columbia.edu/%7Ewoit/wordpress/?p=1076 Notes on BRST I: Representation Theory and Quantum Mechanics]
 
* [http://www.math.columbia.edu/%7Ewoit/wordpress/?p=1076 Notes on BRST I: Representation Theory and Quantum Mechanics]
 
* [http://www.math.columbia.edu/%7Ewoit/wordpress/?p=1103 Notes on BRST II: Lie Algebra Cohomology, Physicist’s Version]
 
* [http://www.math.columbia.edu/%7Ewoit/wordpress/?p=1103 Notes on BRST II: Lie Algebra Cohomology, Physicist’s Version]

2009년 10월 20일 (화) 18:32 판

introduction

Gauge theory = principal G-bundle

We require a quantization of gauge theory.

BRST quantization is one way to quantize the theory and is a part of path integral.

Gauge theory allows 'local symmetry' which should be ignored to be physical. 

This ignoring process leads to the cohomoloy theory.

 

related items

 

 

books

 

 

encyclopedia

 

http://bomber0.byus.net/

 

blogs

 

articles

 

TeX