"Integrable perturbations of Ising model"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
imported>Pythagoras0
imported>Pythagoras0
110번째 줄: 110번째 줄:
 
* G. Delfinoa and G. Mussardo [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213%2898%2900063-7 Non-integrable aspects of the multi-frequency sine-Gordon model], 1998
 
* G. Delfinoa and G. Mussardo [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213%2898%2900063-7 Non-integrable aspects of the multi-frequency sine-Gordon model], 1998
 
* G. Delfinoa and G. Mussardo [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213%2895%2900464-4 The spin-spin correlation function in the two-dimensional Ising model in a magnetic field at T = Tc], 1995
 
* G. Delfinoa and G. Mussardo [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213%2895%2900464-4 The spin-spin correlation function in the two-dimensional Ising model in a magnetic field at T = Tc], 1995
* V. V. Bazhanov, B. Nienhuis, S. O. Warnaar [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693%2894%2991107-X Lattice Ising model in a field: E8 scattering theory], 1994
+
* Bazhanov, V. V., B. Nienhuis, and S. O. Warnaar. ‘Lattice Ising Model in a Field: E8 Scattering Theory’. Physics Letters B 322, no. 3 (17 February 1994): 198–206. doi:[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693%2894%2991107-X 10.1016/0370-2693(94)91107-X].* Braden, H. W., E. Corrigan, P. E. Dorey, and R. Sasaki. 1990. “Aspects of Perturbed Conformal Field Theory, Affine Toda Field Theory and Exact $S$-matrices.” In Differential Geometric Methods in Theoretical Physics (Davis, CA, 1988), 245:169–182. NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. B Phys. New York: Plenum. http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1169481.
* Braden, H. W., E. Corrigan, P. E. Dorey, and R. Sasaki. 1990. “Aspects of Perturbed Conformal Field Theory, Affine Toda Field Theory and Exact $S$-matrices.” In Differential Geometric Methods in Theoretical Physics (Davis, CA, 1988), 245:169–182. NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. B Phys. New York: Plenum. http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1169481.
 
 
* '''[EY]'''T. Eguchi and S.-K. Yang, Deformations of conformal field theories and soliton equations, Phys. Lett. B 224 (1989), 373-8 B
 
* '''[EY]'''T. Eguchi and S.-K. Yang, Deformations of conformal field theories and soliton equations, Phys. Lett. B 224 (1989), 373-8 B
 
* '''[HoM]'''T.J. Hollowood and P.Mansfield, Rational conformal theories at, and away from criticality as Toda field theories, Phys. Lett. B226 (1989) 73-79
 
* '''[HoM]'''T.J. Hollowood and P.Mansfield, Rational conformal theories at, and away from criticality as Toda field theories, Phys. Lett. B226 (1989) 73-79

2015년 4월 15일 (수) 01:43 판

introduction

  • energy perturbation [Kau49], [MTW77]
    • related to A1
    • Ising field theory
  • magnetic perturbation[Zam89]
    • related to E8


Ising field theory

  • the continuum limit of the Ising model is made to look like a field theory only through the application of a certain transformation (Jordan-Winger)
    • "kink" states (boundaries between regions of differing spin) = basic objects of the theory
    • called quasiparticle
  • an entry of S-matrix

$$ S_{1,1}(\theta)=\frac{\tanh \left(\frac{1}{2} \left(\theta +\frac{i \pi }{15}\right)\right)\tanh \left(\frac{1}{2} \left(\theta +\frac{2i \pi }{5}\right)\right)\tanh \left(\frac{1}{2} \left(\theta +\frac{2i \pi }{3}\right)\right)}{\tanh \left(\frac{1}{2} \left(\theta -\frac{i \pi }{15}\right)\right)\tanh \left(\frac{1}{2} \left(\theta -\frac{2i \pi }{5}\right)\right)\tanh \left(\frac{1}{2} \left(\theta -\frac{2i \pi }{3}\right)\right)} $$

  • it has poles with positive residue when $\theta=i y,\, 0<y<\pi$ at $y=\pi/15,2\pi/5,2\pi/3$


constant TBA equation

Y-system


constant Y-system solution

  • constant Y-system

$$ y_{i}^2=\prod _{j\in I} (1+y_{j})^{\mathcal{I}(X)_{ij}} $$

  • solution

$$ \left\{2+2 \sqrt{2},5+4 \sqrt{2},11+8 \sqrt{2},16+12 \sqrt{2},42+30 \sqrt{2},56+40 \sqrt{2},152+108 \sqrt{2},543+384 \sqrt{2}\right\} $$


Klassen-Melzer solution

$$ N=\mathcal{I}(E_8)\cdot(\mathcal{C}(E_8))^{-1}= \left( \begin{array}{cccccccc} 3 & 4 & 6 & 6 & 8 & 8 & 10 & 12 \\ 4 & 7 & 8 & 10 & 12 & 14 & 16 & 20 \\ 6 & 8 & 11 & 12 & 16 & 16 & 20 & 24 \\ 6 & 10 & 12 & 15 & 18 & 20 & 24 & 30 \\ 8 & 12 & 16 & 18 & 23 & 24 & 30 & 36 \\ 8 & 14 & 16 & 20 & 24 & 27 & 32 & 40 \\ 10 & 16 & 20 & 24 & 30 & 32 & 39 & 48 \\ 12 & 20 & 24 & 30 & 36 & 40 & 48 & 59 \\ \end{array} \right) $$

  • note that this is equivalent to

$$ N=2\mathcal{C}(E_8)^{-1}-I_8 $$

  • The TBA equation is

$$ \epsilon_i=\sum_{j}N_{ij}\log (1+e^{-\epsilon_j}) $$ or

$$ e^{\epsilon_i}=\prod_{j}(1+e^{-\epsilon_j})^{N_{ij}} $$

  • we have the relationship $y_i=e^{\epsilon_i}$

history

  • Soon after Zamolodchikov’s first paper [Zam] appeared,
  • Fateev and Zamolodchikov conjectured in [FZ90] that
    • if you take a minimal model CFT constructed from a compact Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ via the coset construction and perturb it in a particular way, then you obtain the affine Toda field theory (ATFT) associated with $\mathfrak{g}$, which is an integrable field theory.
    • This was confirmed in [EY] and [HoM].
  • If you do this with $\mathfrak{g}=E_8$, you arrive at the conjectured integrable field theory investigated by Zamolodchikov and described in the previous paragraph.
  • That is, if we take the $E_8$ ATFT as a starting point, then the assumptions (Z1)–(Z4) become deductions.
  • http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&tbs=tl:1&q=


related items

computational resource


expositions


articles

question and answers(Math Overflow)