"Bruhat decomposition"의 두 판 사이의 차이
		
		
		
		
		
		둘러보기로 가기
		검색하러 가기
		
				
		
		
	
imported>Pythagoras0  | 
				Pythagoras0 (토론 | 기여)   | 
				||
| 1번째 줄: | 1번째 줄: | ||
==introduction==  | ==introduction==  | ||
| − | * Given a Lie group   | + | * Given a Lie group <math>G</math> over <math>\mathbb{C}</math> and a Borel subgroup <math>B</math>, there is famous Bruhat decomposition of the flag variety <math>G/B</math>  | 
| − | *   | + | * <math>G</math> : connected reductive algebraic group over an algebraically closed field  | 
| − | * By allowing one to reduce many questions about   | + | * By allowing one to reduce many questions about <math>G</math> to questions about the Weyl group <math>W</math>, Bruhat decomposition is indispensable for the understanding of both the structure and representations of <math>G</math>  | 
* The order of a Chevalley group over a finite field was computed in '''[C1]''' (using Bruhat decomposition) in terms of the exponents of the Weyl group  | * The order of a Chevalley group over a finite field was computed in '''[C1]''' (using Bruhat decomposition) in terms of the exponents of the Weyl group  | ||
* Bruhat order  | * Bruhat order  | ||
| 10번째 줄: | 10번째 줄: | ||
==example : general linear group==  | ==example : general linear group==  | ||
| − | *   | + | * <math>G=GL_{n}</math>  | 
| − | *   | + | * <math>B</math> : upper triangular matrices in <math>G</math>  | 
| − | *   | + | * <math>B_{-}</math> : lower triangular matrices in <math>G</math>  | 
| − | *   | + | * <math>W=S_{n}</math> we can think of it as a subgroup of <math>G</math>  | 
* Double cosets <math>BwB</math> and <math>B_{-}wB_{-}</math> are called Bruhat cells.  | * Double cosets <math>BwB</math> and <math>B_{-}wB_{-}</math> are called Bruhat cells.  | ||
==(B, N) pair==  | ==(B, N) pair==  | ||
| − | * A   | + | * A <math>(B, N)</math> pair is a pair of subgroups <math>B</math> and <math>N</math> of a group <math>G</math> such that the following axioms hold:  | 
| − | #   | + | # <math>G</math> is generated by <math>B</math> and <math>N</math>  | 
| − | # The intersection,   | + | # The intersection, <math>T</math>, of <math>B</math> and <math>N</math> is a normal subgroup of N  | 
| − | # The group   | + | # The group <math>W = N/T</math> is generated by a set <math>S</math> of elements <math>w_i</math> of order 2, for <math>i</math> in some non-empty set <math>I</math>  | 
| − | # If   | + | # If <math>w_i</math> is an element of <math>S</math> and <math>w</math> is any element of <math>W</math>, then <math>w_iBw</math> is contained in the union of <math>Bw_iwB</math> and <math>BwB</math>  | 
| − | # No generator   | + | # No generator <math>w_i</math> normalizes <math>B</math>  | 
| − | * we say   | + | * we say <math>(B,N)</math> form a <math>BN</math>-pair of <math>G</math>, or that <math>(G,B,N,S)</math> is a Tits system  | 
| − | * we call   | + | * we call <math>B</math> the Borel subgroup of <math>G</math>, and <math>W=N/B\cap N</math> the Weyl group associated with the Tits system  | 
| − | * the rank of the Tits system is defined to be   | + | * the rank of the Tits system is defined to be <math>|S|</math>  | 
===why do we care?===  | ===why do we care?===  | ||
| − | *   | + | * <math>(B, N)</math> pair is a structure on groups of Lie type that allows one to give uniform proofs of many results, instead of giving a large number of case-by-case proofs.    | 
* Roughly speaking, it shows that all such groups are similar to the general linear group over a field  | * Roughly speaking, it shows that all such groups are similar to the general linear group over a field  | ||
* BN-pairs can be used to prove that most groups of Lie type are simple  | * BN-pairs can be used to prove that most groups of Lie type are simple  | ||
| 35번째 줄: | 35번째 줄: | ||
==Bruhat decomposition theorem==  | ==Bruhat decomposition theorem==  | ||
;thm  | ;thm  | ||
| − | Let   | + | Let <math>G</math> be a group with a <math>BN</math>-pair. Then  | 
| − | + | :<math>  | |
G=BWB  | G=BWB  | ||
| − | + | </math>  | |
or,    | or,    | ||
| − | + | :<math>  | |
G=\cup_{w\in W}BwB  | G=\cup_{w\in W}BwB  | ||
| − | + | </math>  | |
| − | in which the union is disjoint, where   | + | in which the union is disjoint, where <math>BwB</math> is taken to mean <math>B\dot{w}B</math> for any <math>\dot{w}\in N</math> with <math>\dot{w}T=w</math>  | 
2020년 11월 16일 (월) 04:30 판
introduction
- Given a Lie group \(G\) over \(\mathbb{C}\) and a Borel subgroup \(B\), there is famous Bruhat decomposition of the flag variety \(G/B\)
 - \(G\) : connected reductive algebraic group over an algebraically closed field
 - By allowing one to reduce many questions about \(G\) to questions about the Weyl group \(W\), Bruhat decomposition is indispensable for the understanding of both the structure and representations of \(G\)
 - The order of a Chevalley group over a finite field was computed in [C1] (using Bruhat decomposition) in terms of the exponents of the Weyl group
 - Bruhat order
 - Weyl group action
 
example : general linear group
- \(G=GL_{n}\)
 - \(B\) : upper triangular matrices in \(G\)
 - \(B_{-}\) : lower triangular matrices in \(G\)
 - \(W=S_{n}\) we can think of it as a subgroup of \(G\)
 - Double cosets \(BwB\) and \(B_{-}wB_{-}\) are called Bruhat cells.
 
(B, N) pair
- A \((B, N)\) pair is a pair of subgroups \(B\) and \(N\) of a group \(G\) such that the following axioms hold:
 
- \(G\) is generated by \(B\) and \(N\)
 - The intersection, \(T\), of \(B\) and \(N\) is a normal subgroup of N
 - The group \(W = N/T\) is generated by a set \(S\) of elements \(w_i\) of order 2, for \(i\) in some non-empty set \(I\)
 - If \(w_i\) is an element of \(S\) and \(w\) is any element of \(W\), then \(w_iBw\) is contained in the union of \(Bw_iwB\) and \(BwB\)
 - No generator \(w_i\) normalizes \(B\)
 
- we say \((B,N)\) form a \(BN\)-pair of \(G\), or that \((G,B,N,S)\) is a Tits system
 - we call \(B\) the Borel subgroup of \(G\), and \(W=N/B\cap N\) the Weyl group associated with the Tits system
 - the rank of the Tits system is defined to be \(|S|\)
 
why do we care?
- \((B, N)\) pair is a structure on groups of Lie type that allows one to give uniform proofs of many results, instead of giving a large number of case-by-case proofs.
 - Roughly speaking, it shows that all such groups are similar to the general linear group over a field
 - BN-pairs can be used to prove that most groups of Lie type are simple
 
Bruhat decomposition theorem
- thm
 
Let \(G\) be a group with a \(BN\)-pair. Then \[ G=BWB \] or, \[ G=\cup_{w\in W}BwB \] in which the union is disjoint, where \(BwB\) is taken to mean \(B\dot{w}B\) for any \(\dot{w}\in N\) with \(\dot{w}T=w\)
memo
computational resource
encyclopedia
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/(B,_N)_pair
 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_element_of_a_Coxeter_group
 - http://eom.springer.de/b/b017690.htm
 
expositions
- Lusztig, G. 2010. “Bruhat Decomposition and Applications.” arXiv:1006.5004 [math] (June 25). http://arxiv.org/abs/1006.5004.
 - http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/week186.html
 - Bruhat decomposition via row reduction
 
articles
- [C1] Chevalley, C. 1955. “Sur Certains Groupes Simples.” The Tohoku Mathematical Journal. Second Series 7: 14–66.
 - Bruhat, Fran\ccois. 1956. “Sur Les Représentations Induites Des Groupes de Lie.” Bulletin de La Société Mathématique de France 84: 97–205.
 
question and answers(Math Overflow)
- http://mathoverflow.net/questions/15438/a-slick-proof-of-the-bruhat-decomposition-for-gl-nk
 - http://mathoverflow.net/questions/28569/is-there-a-morse-theory-proof-of-the-bruhat-decomposition
 - http://mathoverflow.net/questions/168033/coxeter-groups-parabolic-subgroups/168035#168035
 - http://mathoverflow.net/questions/188920/closure-relations-between-bruhat-cells-on-the-flag-variety/190961#190961