"Epipolar geometry"의 두 판 사이의 차이

수학노트
둘러보기로 가기 검색하러 가기
(→‎메타데이터: 새 문단)
19번째 줄: 19번째 줄:
 
===소스===
 
===소스===
 
  <references />
 
  <references />
 +
 +
== 메타데이터 ==
 +
 +
===위키데이터===
 +
* ID :  [https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q200904 Q200904]

2020년 12월 26일 (토) 05:20 판

노트

위키데이터

말뭉치

  1. Epipolar geometry describes the geometric relationship between two camera systems.[1]
  2. In this section we will deal with epipolar geometry.[2]
  3. This paper gives a comparison of SAR imaging and camera imaging from the viewpoint of epipolar geometry.[3]
  4. The imaging model and epipolar geometry of the two sensors are analyzed in detail.[3]
  5. The standard epipolar geometry setup involves two cameras observing the same 3D point P, whose projection in each of the image planes is located at p and p’ respectively.[4]
  6. An interesting case of epipolar geometry is shown in Figure 4, which occurs when the image planes are parallel to each other.[4]
  7. The application of projective geometry to this situation results in the now popular epipolar geometry approach.[5]
  8. Due to the linearity of the above equation, the epipolar geometry approach maintains a clean elegance in its manipulations.[5]
  9. The result is that it is not possible to determine the epipolar geometry between close consecutive frames and it cannot be determined from image correspondences alone.[5]
  10. The linearization in epipolar geometry creates these degeneracies and numerical ill-conditioning near them.[5]
  11. To calculate depth information from a pair of images we need to compute the epipolar geometry.[6]
  12. We first describe properties of the epipolar geometry of two affine cameras, and its optimal computation from point correspondences.[7]
  13. The epipolar geometry then describes the relation between the two resulting views.[8]

소스

메타데이터

위키데이터